St. Peter's expansion a go

It was with a large dose of reservation, but Mount Pearl City council has given the English School District approval for a “pretty sizable extension” of St. Peter’s Junior High School on Munden Drive.

The work will include the creation of a new exit from the parking lot of the school onto Munden Drive, which council hopes will ease traffic problems in the area.

Planning and Development Committee chairman Andrew Ledwell said the extension includes completion of a “junior high sized” gymnasium with a stage and change rooms. The main floor of the old gym will be converted into a cafeteria and kitchen, with a second floor added to accommodate six new classrooms. The existing cafeteria will be converted into two additional classrooms. The work is expected to take 18 months to two years.

“This is a pretty sizable extension,” said Ledwell, adding the plans include expansion of the parking lot and the creation of a driveway around the school leading to the new access on Munden Drive.

To gain the new access, to be situated between 93 and 95 Munden Drive, the school board needs to acquire city owned land that is now used as a pathway.

“It is proposed that it will be a single lane with a side walk and right turning only,” said Ledwell.

A public meeting on the development was held March 19. Three people attended. The City issued over 200 notices to residents in the neighbourhood about the meeting.

“There were a number of concerns that were expressed,” said Ledwell. “Those revolve around traffic flow, the impact on the neighbourhood in terms of noise and safety, potential problems with traffic – both on foot and on four wheels – and the loss of some green space.”

Ledwell said the longer driveway around the school will allow for the stacking of some 75 cars, which would enter from the current access and exit through the new one. “It’s thought that the stacking of the 75 cars would allow for traffic to come off of Munden Drive thereby reducing congestion on the street,” he said. “At least that’s the hope.”

The school board has committed to install privacy fencing between the new exit and the neighbours immediately adjacent to it. Ledwell said that after much discussion at the committee level, the recommendation is to approve the application. He then moved that the city also conduct a survey on the land needed for the new exit so that it can be leased to the school board.

Councillor Lucy Stoyles said she could not support it.  “I have a major concern with this,” said Stoyles. “I have had since the get go.”

Stoyles said she attended all but one of the public forums about school changes that were held by the board last year and has spoken with residents around St. Peter’s. “I’m quite familiar with the school, my three children went to this school,” she said. “From the time it was built it was too small, it was busting out of the seams.”

Stoyles said while the extension is needed she objects to the effect the new exit will have on the immediate neighbours. “If I was living there, I wouldn’t want it next to me,” she said. “I really can’t support that access going in there.”

Stoyles suggested the school board should have tried to buy one of the neighbouring houses to make more room for the exit. “I really don’t think the school board did a good review of the whole system,” she argued. “People were up in arms for months last year, almost all the public forums were full.”

Deputy Mayor Jim Locke, who chaired Tuesday’s public meeting in the absence of Mayor Randy Simms, asked Stoyles what she would do differently. Stoyles said she would send some of the children to a different school.

Councillor John Walsh said the changes to the school are “substantive and sweeping” and he shares Stoyles’ concerns. He noted the neighbour who is most affected by the changes, who has problems with vandalism and noise over the years, also continues to have concerns.

“But I recognize as a councillor that something has to be done,” Walsh said. “It’s not as easy as saying, ‘Put them in another building.’ There is no other building. The buildings are all overcrowded, unfortunately.”

Walsh said as long as the new exit from the school allows for right turning traffic only, the new configuration should alleviate some of the traffic congestion on Munden Drive. “For me this is about balancing, using the resources that you have and trying to find the suitable balance,” he added. “I share the concerns , but I see this as an opportunity and I want to make sure that our Planning Department and our council really hold the School Board’s feet to the fire in terms of following through, particularly on the promises made (to the neighbour)… When you look at everything in totality, this is the best and safest and most prudent decision. It’s not perfect, but the fitting in of the school building into the neighborhood was never perfect. This is as good as it’s going to get.”

Councillor Dave Aker urged council to reach out to the neighbours to ensure their concerns are taken into account by the school board. He agreed the proposed loop around the school should alleviate traffic problems in the area.

Councillor Paula Tessier too said the proposed changes are a chance to make the traffic situation better. The privacy fence might also improve things better for the resident when it comes to vandalism, she said.

Ledwell said while he is also sympathetic about the impact on the immediate neighbours, he agrees with Walsh that council must err on the side of safety. “I think we have to let this go ahead, because we have to look after the safety of our students,” he said.

Calling the vote on Ledwell’s motion, Deputy Mayor Locke observed that “If it doesn’t work… we’re not averse to revisiting it.”

On the vote, the motion passed with everyone in support except Stoyles, who voted nay.

 

 

Posted on May 7, 2015 .

City stands firm with developer over building permits

Prospect Development will have to fix the remaining deficiencies on the first three phases of the Pearlview West subdivision off Moffat Drive before Mount Pearl City council will approve any building permits for phase four.

That was the consensus at council on Tuesday after Planning and Development Committee chairman Andrew Ledwell asked for clarification on the decision council made back in November regarding the six phase development.

At that meeting, council voted to withhold any more building permits until the deficiencies are addressed, but did approve clearing and scrubbing of the land for phase four. It took some debate for Mayor Randy Simms to agree to allow any work to go ahead until the deficiencies, which included problems with trees that had been planted by the developer and the need to sod a slope on Pollux Drive, were remedied. Councillor Lucy Stoyles voted against approval of the clearing and grubbing at that meeting.

Ledwell noted that residents have been e-mailing council again lately about “concerns that were unaddressed.” He was raising the issue again, he added, “to remove any doubt” about how council plans to address the continued expansion of the subdivision. “What is our commitment in terms of phase four and beyond for Pearlview and Moffatt Road subdivision?”

Councillor John Walsh allowed his interpretation of council’s November decision was that the developer would be allowed to install some of the underground infrastructure for phase four since the equipment for the work was already in place. “It just made so much sense to do that,” he noted. “I supported it. What I don’t support however is outstanding deficiencies in phases one, two and three and at the same time issuing further development permits. I don’t care whether they are building permits. Building permits are the very last thing you will do in a development. I don’t think we should be allowing any development permits, period, until any outstanding deficiencies – and they are minor now – are (remedied).”

Stoyles repeated her concerns from November. “I don’t want any more permits given out to the developer until every last deficiency is looked after,” she said. “There are six phases in this, so they still have a long ways to go. I think we need to send a message out to the developer that the residents are our priority.”

Councillor Dave Aker said he agreed with Ledwell’s assessment. “We were trying to strike a balance between not overly punishing the developer, but at the same time making sure they were not running roughshod over the residents,” he explained. “So we let them go ahead and start some work on phase four, but then to ensure – because we didn’t want to see phase four started and all the new houses built and all these deficiencies sitting there – I believe council’s decision at the time was that we hold back and review every building permit… Now positions can change, but I still think we should hold the developer to our requirement.”

Councillor Paula Tessier asked whether the matter can be quickly settled by meeting with the developer, outlining the deficiencies and giving the company a week to address them.

According to the City’s manager of planning and inspection services, Julia Schwarz, a meeting has been held with the developer who is addressing the slope problem at Pollux Drive. However, the issue of the quality of trees that were planted in the earlier phases has yet to be rectified.

“Let’s give them a reasonable time limit that should please the residents and that will give the developer an opportunity to get it done, but the operative phase being ‘Get it done,’” Tessier suggested.

“We’re not in a situation where this development has all kinds of deficiencies,” Ledwell concluded. “We are getting close to addressing this… I certainly have no problem saying to the developer that there will be no permits – development or otherwise – issued until these couple of issues are addressed, and giving them a time frame to do that… I just want to make sure that that is our commitment as a City to the residents… I want to be able to share the same message with the residents of the area and make sure that they know that we have their backs on this and are making sure all of the issues will be addressed.”

 

Posted on May 7, 2015 .

Mount Pearl artists recognized with Arts & Letters awards

Three artists from Mount Pearl were among the winners of provincial Arts & Letters Awards handed out at The Rooms in St. John’s this past weekend.

They were among some 553 Newfoundland and Labrador artists who submitted works in categories ranging from poetry and short fiction to dramatic scripts, prose, French literary writing, music and visual art.

Megan Penney received an award and a $350 prize for Supreme in the Junior Poetry category. Some 81 people competed in that category with eight receiving awards and cheques.

Rebecca Simms was one of four winners from 29 entries in the Senior Music division. Her contemporary classical music composition was entitled, Bud. She received a cheque of $1,000 as part of the award.

In the Senior Visual Art category, Danny Woodrow’s acrylic and oil on board painting The Modern Stump was one of 12 award winners. He also received a cheque for $1,000. Some 131 artists submitted works in the category with well-established painters Rod Hand and Ellie Yonova among the winners.

I would like to offer my congratulations to all the winners of the 2015 Arts and Letters Program,” said Brian Way, Chairman of the Arts and Letters Program. “The award show not only showcases the diverse artistic talent that exists throughout our province, but also provides the opportunity for artists to view each other’s works and receive feedback from their peers.”

The awards are funded by the provincial government and overseen by the Department of Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development.

“The provincial government acknowledges and applauds the important role Newfoundland and Labrador’s creative and talented visual, musical and literary artists play in the continued development and sustainability of our cultural industries and the province’s heritage,” said the minister for the department, Darrin King. “Our province has a tremendously vibrant and active cultural community and as a government, we are pleased to invest in programs like Arts and Letters that support the arts. Congratulations to all this year’s winners and participants.”

Posted on May 7, 2015 .